This week we learned about pricing.
We performed a detailed price elasticity
exercise and learned that a price which results in calculated price elasticity
value of 1.00 would also likely be the point that provides the most positive
marketing contribution.
This can be
confirmed by looking at the Tradeoff analysis.
The picture below (I finally did it!) shows how Allround stacks up with the
increased price of $5.75.
This is very
close to where the contribution value would be at its maximum.
It is reasonable to conclude that prices
which cause your plot point to be left of the tradeoff line would be elastic
(absolute calculated price elasticity >1.0), prices which fall on the line
have an absolute calculated price elasticity of unity (=1.0), and prices to the
right of the line would be inelastic (<1.0).
Although Drucker calls it a deadly sin, if your pricing objective is profit-oriented,
it makes sense to try to be on the line and maximize marketing contribution.
However, you should also try not to have a myopic view of
your market.
If you narrowly defined
your market to be OTC Cold medications, the Tradeoffs Plot becomes as shown
below.
This could give the false
impression that you can raise the price even higher to increase marketing
contribution when, in fact, you would be moving your price into the elastic
region in the previous plot and not achieve maximum marketing contribution.
It might make sense to raise your price based
on the value in the OTC Cold market if you were to introduce new products in
the cough and/or allergy markets which you know will cannibalize some of your
existing sales, anyway, as long as you also price the new products on (to
maximize profit) or to the right of (to gain market share) the tradeoff line.
One of this week’s prompts is to discuss something
interesting that is happening in marketing this week.
During the class we touched on how changing
pricing strategy can affect your business and I mentioned that J.C. Penney made
that mistake.
Here is an article
(actually a WSJ blog post) which details how they are continuing to slide as a
result of changing to an EDLP retailer.
The specific quote that really pertains to this week’s topic is “
The Company noted that results for the quarter also reflect
its prior pricing and marketing strategies, which are being changed
under new leadership.” WSJ online
requires a subscription, but they usually allow you to view one article per
day, so you should be able to see it.
This is a good segway into the most recent audio book that I
listened to on my long commute, “The Ten Commandments for Business Failure,” by
Donald R. Keough. Don has some personal experience
with failure as he was the one who gave us New Coke. What was interesting is that they actually
had pretty sound reasoning based on research that they had performed. His warning is that, while many believe that
we are living in the Information Age, he thinks we are still just in the Data
Age and we should not confuse the two.
That, he says, was his mistake with New Coke. Data supported the decision. The taste tests that they performed proved
that people liked the taste of New Coke better.
But it wasn’t the taste that led to the failure of New Coke. It was a part of their past that they
identified with and didn’t want changed.
Fortunately for Don, they were able to recover. Maybe J.C. Penney will, too. Time will tell. It’s a witty book that I enjoyed very much
and highly recommend it.
For those interested, the Ten Commandments are as follows:
1.
Quit Taking Risks
2. Be Inflexible
3. Isolate Yourself
4. Assume Infallibility
5. Play the Game Close to the Foul Line
6. Don’t Take Time to Think
7. Put All Your Faith in Experts & Outside Consultants
8. Love Your Bureaucracy
9. Send Mixed Messages
10. Be Afraid of the Future
The right price, according to Drucker, is what the customer
values the product or service at in the context of the market. According to Drucker, this is the starting
point and you should then consider costs to determine if the product or service
can be sold at a profit, either now or in the future if and when costs can be
reduced based on learning and experience curves. When considering costs, you need to consider
the entire chain of costs associated with the product or service and recognize
opportunities to also improve those costs.
No comments:
Post a Comment